This Month in Mormon Literature, Very Late January 2015

Boyd J. Petersen was named the next editor of Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought. Another former AML President, Melissa Proffitt, published her first novel. SLC ComicCon is going on, and lots of LDS authors are there waiting for you to meet them. There was a change in the top leadership at Covenant Communications. Michaelbrent Collings is on the preliminary ballot for a Bram Stoker award, and the LDS Poetry Slam winners are announced. Some good news on the Nunes plagiarism case. Among the newly published books are Mary Bradford’s personal essay collection, Michael Jensen and David Powers King’s Woven (the book that Cedar Fort controversially dropped in 2013, and ended up at Scholastic instead), and Brandon Sanderson’s Steelheart sequel Firefight (which went to #1 on the NYT YA list). The Maze Runner stays the #1 NYT Children’s Series for 5 weeks in a row. Two films by Mormon directors premiered at the Sundance Film Festival, Jared Hess’ comedy Don Verdean, and Greg Whitley’s documentary Most Likely to Succeed. A new Melissa Leilani Larson web series. Jim Bennett writes with bitter humor about his experiences rewriting the outdoor musical Utah! at Tuachan in 2002, and the difficulty of making art while trying not to offend anyone. And speaking of funny, read Steven Peck’s replies to student questions.

 News and blog posts

The finalists for both the Whitney Awards and the AML Awards will be announced in the next couple of weeks. Continue reading

Posted in This Week in Mormon Literature | 4 Comments

Robert Benchley Gives a Sacrament Meeting Talk

.

RBenchleyGood morning, brothers and sisters. Don’t you all look so nice in your Sunday finery! I see Sister Rosenthal picked up some of that charming purple lipstick she noticed on my collar last week. I feel obliged to admit that same purple mark is there this week as well, but it has nothing to do with Sister Rosenthal who, as the credit-card record will doubtless prove, purchased hers this week on my collar’s recommendation. My own shirt remains unlaundered because putting it in the laundry is my own treasured responsibility and last week, as with every week, I rushed home after Church, removed my white shirt, and shoved it in the back of the closet where I would not have to see its blinding whiteness each morning as I stumble through my new coffee-free, white-shirt wearing existence.

Which, by tidy coincidence, brings us to this week’s topic given to me by that most marvelous of men, that giant of spirituality, that titan of tithing-observance, that glutton for goodness, that stallion on . . . of . . . . I say, Brother Marshall, what was it you wrote here? (Laughter.) I would apologize, but even old gags deserve a night on the town now and then.

Which again brings us back to my topic today, fidelity in marriage. I would like to address my comments to the unmarried members of our ward who I suspect may otherwise feel a bit left out, fidelity rhyming, as it does, with gelati, the plural of gelato, being the preferred vice of my fellow teetotalers in the crowd today. That said, I should admit that fidelity in marriage is certainly something Sister Benchley and I have always gotten a real kick out of. In fact, the only reason I’ve never joined the Marines to get away from her is I’ve got semper fidelis enough already, thank you very much, and I understand the Corps does not offer recruits the more interesting flavors of gelato such as cardamom and burnt hazelnut and tuna.

So fidelity in marriage is terrific, just terrific, and something to keep working towards if you feel you must, but for those of you young and old without marriage to fidel to, let me tell you the story of the orangutan. Until modern zoology showed up in Borneo to get their story straight, orangutans were understood by themselves and other not to be red apes at all, but red men with long arms who lived sober, solitary lives in the jungle. Sober, solitary and wise. Wise probably because of the solitude, and solitary no doubt due to the sobriety. Presumably there were orangutan women as well, but such hair would give them enough to talk about that the whole solitude part of the equation might have broken down immediately. In my experience, excepting purple lipstick, nothing excites feminine conversation like bounteous red hair, particularly when it covers the body entire. Which is getting to my primary thesis that if you live in the tops of trees, people are less likely to ask annoying questions of you such as which half of the future baby do you keep in your trousers. Not that arboreal life is for all of us—I’m much too fond of a gin and tonic for that lifestyle (a joke I now see will need to be recalibrated for this particular audience)—but the metaphor remains a certain beauty all the same.

Trees being, of course, God’s favorite metaphor, whether it’s knowledge for Eve or no figs for Jesus or shiny lightbulbs for Lehi to prank his children with, God likes to put his best ideas at the end of a nice limb, if you know what I mean. And this is why fidelity in marriage is exactly what it’s cracked up to be, and so am I.

In conclusion, as long as we have fidelity in marriage we will never have to ask whose purple lipstick that is, and I think we can all agree that leaving that particular question unasked can only be the best for everyone.

Posted in Funny Stuff | 2 Comments

On Mormon Alternate History Stories

Last year, William Morris announced on A Motley Vision that he would be putting together an anthology of Mormon alternate history stories. As William explained in his first post on the subject, Mormon writers seem to be turning to alternate history in the wake of the Mormon Moment for “more compelling ways of expressing our culture and help[ing] us think through both our past and future trajectories in interesting and fruitful ways.” As evidence, he cites D. J. Butler’s City of the Saints and several Mormon Lit Blitz entries. To this list you could add Steve Peck’s “A Strange Report from Church Archives,” published in the final issue of Irreantum, and a handful of stories and comics in Monsters and Mormons.

I’ve always preferred historical fiction to other genres, and alternate history has fascinated me since I was a kid playing Civil War video games that allowed me to change the outcomes of famous battles. In the last few years, I have thought much about the common ground between fiction and history, particularly in the writing of it. Aside from the academic work I’ve done in this area, which has dealt somewhat with alternate history, I’ve done some creative work as well. On Wilderness Interface Zone, for example, I published two works of historical fiction—“The Curse of Eve” and “The Mechanics of Creation.” Of the two, “The Mechanics of Creation” is more of an alternate history—if only because the main characters are actual historical figures engaged in a situation that, while possible, likely never happened.

Continue reading

Posted in Mormon LitCrit | Tagged , , | 17 Comments

In Tents #49 This Jesus Whom Ye Slew and Other Texts That Don’t Behave

In the mid 1970s some theatrical entrepreneurs started thinking about a movie theater statistic: Attendance was lowest onTuesday and Wednesday. Could they fill more seats by offering a subscription film series on those nights, presenting great plays to a nationwide audience? I got season tickets (or saw a lot of the films, anyway), as did some of my high school friends, my father, and some of his faculty friends. I was excited to see Ionesco’s Rhinoceros, and enjoyed Gene Wilder and Zero Mostel as the leads. Lost in the Stars was haunting, and I loved Jacques Brel is Alive and Well and Living in Paris, which included Brel singing one song–”Ne Me Quitte Pas”–after the intermission. I recognized it as the original of Terry Jacks’ hit “If You Go Away,” but better. (I found out Jacks’ other hit, “Seasons in the Sun” was also drawn from Brel.)

I saw a lot of other films and enjoyed them, including Robert Shaw’s take-off on the Eichmann trial, The Man in the Glass Booth. Israeli agents kidnap Arthur Goldman and take him to Jerusalem to stand trial as a Nazi war criminal. At one point in the trial his assistant, Charlie, says something like, “Of course he’s a Jew. Who else could possibly be so anti-Semitic?” (I think it was at the end of Act I, but when I perused a copy of the play on a recent visit to BYU’s library I couldn’t find it.) A nice bit of comic relief in a fairly dark play, and poignantly prophetic.

I think about that line often when thinking about Jesus’s conversations with the Pharisees. Nothing Jesus says to them is harsher than the opening chapter of Isaiah.

Continue reading

Posted in General, Literary Views of Scripture | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

2014 Mormon Literature Year in Review — Part 1, National Market

I am splitting up the yearly review into two parts, first nationally published fiction by Mormon authors, then in February I will cover fiction published in the Mormon and independent markets.

I start with the surprising flow of Mormon literary fiction that appeared in the second half of the year. Then I will look at best-sellers and particularly well reviewed juvenile and speculative fiction books. And continue from there.

s WifeFor many years Mormon literature fans have been waiting for (quoting Theric) “A novel (1) about active Mormons (2) written by an active Mormon (3) is placed before a national audience where it makes a notably broad impact on discourse.” There have been several novels in recent years that met two of those criteria, but not one that met all three. In December we finally got one, Mette Ivie Harrison’s The Bishop’s Wife. Harrison has produced a murder mystery that explores Mormon beliefs, practices, and culture at the center of the discussion. She goes beyond stereotypes, creating complex, fleshed-out characters, whose relationships with each other are all informed to one degree or another by their membership in the Church. Although some have criticized what they see as an info dump explaining Mormon practices through internal dialogue early in the book, apparently requested by the publisher, overall it is an exciting development to see a real insider provide her take on Mormon culture to the broader world. Also, her New York City publisher decided to make promoting the book a priority, ensuring that unlike other such books, The Bishop’s Wife will reach a wider audience. Hopefully some of those readers will then seek out more literature about Mormons. Harrison has had several YA fantasy novels published in the past, this is her first adult mystery novel. It will be the first in a series. Don’t miss Theric’s reviews and discussion of the novel at A Motley Vision.

cityofbrickandshadowIt is inevitable to compare The Bishop’s Wife to another Mormon literary mystery published just weeks earlier, Tim Wirkus’ debut novel City of Brick and Shadow. Continue reading

Posted in This Week in Mormon Literature | 5 Comments

in verse #49 : Voice of the paper

In responding to my last post, “Voice of the turtle,” Jonathan Langford wrote:

It’s interesting that in your reading, Whitman — who was all about “voice” — is actually print-oriented, while Joseph Smith (source of some of our most striking scriptural quotes about the importance of written records, including but not limited to scriptures) is oriented toward [the] speaking voice.

I was, myself, surprised to learn that Matt Miller, in Collage of myself : Walt Whitman and the making of Leaves of grass, apparently argues that Whitman speculated that Leaves of grass might be a novel or a play as late as 1854, the year before the first edition was published.[i] But then I had never heard before what Miller claims Continue reading

Posted in In Verse, Literary Views of Scripture, Mormon LitCrit | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment