<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dawning of a Brighter Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mormonletters.org/index.php?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mormonletters.org</link>
	<description>Mormon Literature in the 21st Century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:03:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mentioning Mormons in science fiction by Meg Stout</title>
		<link>http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43751</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg Stout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43751</guid>
		<description>So that 2008 workshop was the birth of your Nebula story? Sweet. Loved that one. Then again, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve had anything other than positive inclinations to any of your polished works (or even non-polished, darn you for being so brilliant).

On re-reading your Nebula story, I was super impressed with the economy with which you covered everything. I don&#039;t know that there was a single wasted word.

I think any story that makes itself accessible to a wide audience can be a success. A problem with some &#039;Mormon&#039; fiction is the writers lack the perspective to make their tale accessible. You give some very good pointers on addressing that problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that 2008 workshop was the birth of your Nebula story? Sweet. Loved that one. Then again, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve had anything other than positive inclinations to any of your polished works (or even non-polished, darn you for being so brilliant).</p>
<p>On re-reading your Nebula story, I was super impressed with the economy with which you covered everything. I don&#8217;t know that there was a single wasted word.</p>
<p>I think any story that makes itself accessible to a wide audience can be a success. A problem with some &#8216;Mormon&#8217; fiction is the writers lack the perspective to make their tale accessible. You give some very good pointers on addressing that problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mentioning Mormons in science fiction by Martin L. Shoemaker</title>
		<link>http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43744</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin L. Shoemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43744</guid>
		<description>As a non-Mormon who just followed you over here from Facebook, I have to say it ranges from a non-issue to a mild positive for me. I think the most irrational projection some writers make is a future where human beings do not have faiths. We have for all recorded history. Ruthlessly atheistic societies have failed to stamp out faith. If you want to write believable future characters, you might be able to &lt;i&gt;ignore&lt;/i&gt; matters of faith, but you can&#039;t believably pretend that faith won&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a non-Mormon who just followed you over here from Facebook, I have to say it ranges from a non-issue to a mild positive for me. I think the most irrational projection some writers make is a future where human beings do not have faiths. We have for all recorded history. Ruthlessly atheistic societies have failed to stamp out faith. If you want to write believable future characters, you might be able to <i>ignore</i> matters of faith, but you can&#8217;t believably pretend that faith won&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mentioning Mormons in science fiction by Jonathan Langford</title>
		<link>http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43741</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Langford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43741</guid>
		<description>Maybe LDS sf&amp;f readers are less paranoid about that than the general mill of LDS readers. In fact, it would make sense. That thing you mentioned about the reader *always* needing to interpret an alien environment...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe LDS sf&#038;f readers are less paranoid about that than the general mill of LDS readers. In fact, it would make sense. That thing you mentioned about the reader *always* needing to interpret an alien environment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mentioning Mormons in science fiction by Eric James Stone</title>
		<link>http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43739</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric James Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43739</guid>
		<description>Lee, I look forward to reading the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee, I look forward to reading the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mentioning Mormons in science fiction by Eric James Stone</title>
		<link>http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43738</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric James Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43738</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing out the truncated sentence. I&#039;ve fixed that.

As for the question of whether any Mormon readers felt it was too Mormon for a national market: Not to my knowledge. I ran it through two writing groups populated with Mormons, and nobody raised that concern about the story as a whole, although they might have pointed out some things I could clarify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing out the truncated sentence. I&#8217;ve fixed that.</p>
<p>As for the question of whether any Mormon readers felt it was too Mormon for a national market: Not to my knowledge. I ran it through two writing groups populated with Mormons, and nobody raised that concern about the story as a whole, although they might have pointed out some things I could clarify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mentioning Mormons in science fiction by Jonathan Langford</title>
		<link>http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43736</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Langford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43736</guid>
		<description>Very nice article. I like your recipe for how to mention Mormons without offending or &quot;losing&quot; non-Mormon readers -- all of the items on the list make sense and have good reasons for me.

Based on my experience, I have to wonder whether any *Mormon* readers have thought your stories were &quot;too Mormon&quot; for a national market. My experience is that Mormons often think non-Mormons won&#039;t &quot;get it&quot; when in fact they get it pretty well. 

A side note: It looks like your point 4 was truncated at the end. Was there something you intended to add after &quot;wanted to show&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice article. I like your recipe for how to mention Mormons without offending or &#8220;losing&#8221; non-Mormon readers &#8212; all of the items on the list make sense and have good reasons for me.</p>
<p>Based on my experience, I have to wonder whether any *Mormon* readers have thought your stories were &#8220;too Mormon&#8221; for a national market. My experience is that Mormons often think non-Mormons won&#8217;t &#8220;get it&#8221; when in fact they get it pretty well. </p>
<p>A side note: It looks like your point 4 was truncated at the end. Was there something you intended to add after &#8220;wanted to show&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mentioning Mormons in science fiction by Lee Allred</title>
		<link>http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43735</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Allred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43735</guid>
		<description>Very good article, Eric!

As luck would have it, I&#039;m right in the middle of writing an essay on including Mormons in one&#039;s fiction (the don&#039;t dos as well as the how tos) for a project I have going on and will now undoubtedly be pulling tasty, tasty quotes from this article. I&#039;d already been planning using your excellent story as a how to example, but this really helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article, Eric!</p>
<p>As luck would have it, I&#8217;m right in the middle of writing an essay on including Mormons in one&#8217;s fiction (the don&#8217;t dos as well as the how tos) for a project I have going on and will now undoubtedly be pulling tasty, tasty quotes from this article. I&#8217;d already been planning using your excellent story as a how to example, but this really helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mentioning Mormons in science fiction by Lee Allred</title>
		<link>http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43729</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Allred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43729</guid>
		<description>Mormonentous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mormonentous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mentioning Mormons in science fiction by Wm</title>
		<link>http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43710</link>
		<dc:creator>Wm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 20:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4505#comment-43710</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be using &quot;Mormonal&quot; quite often from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be using &#8220;Mormonal&#8221; quite often from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Mormon Ibsen: A Tribute to Eric Samuelsen by Wm</title>
		<link>http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4480#comment-43691</link>
		<dc:creator>Wm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mormonletters.org/?p=4480#comment-43691</guid>
		<description>&quot;long thought&quot; is what I meant to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;long thought&#8221; is what I meant to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

